Maybe I'm being a little picky here, but DotNetKicks seems like they have been pretty loose with their definition of what constitutes a .NET story.  I like having a feed to the site that aggregates a lot of different .NET topics, but it seems like there's been a lot of tangential sort of stories lately.  I mean stories on JavaScript frameworks, HTML or Windows are ok, but they're really not that focused on .NET. I wonder if it's just a case of people simply kicking stories that they like, regardless of the relevance.

It would be nice if there was a way to downvote some of the stories that weren't really relevant but I realize that opens a whole other can of worms.  I'll continue to support the site, but I may end up dropping it out of my feeds if the trend doesn't change.